Though the structure of your repository and modules file interact with your build system (e.g. Makefiles), they are essentially independent.
cvsnt does not dictate how you build anything. It merely stores files for retrieval in a tree structure you devise.
cvsnt does not dictate how to use disk space in the checked out working directories. If you write your Makefiles or scripts in every directory so they have to know the relative positions of everything else, you wind up requiring the entire repository to be checked out.
If you modularize your work, and construct a build system that will share files (via links, mounts, VPATH in Makefiles, etc.), you can arrange your disk usage however you like.
But you have to remember that any such system is a lot of work to construct and maintain. cvsnt does not address the issues involved.
Of course, you should place the tools created to support such a build system (scripts, Makefiles, etc) under cvsnt.
Figuring out what files need to be rebuilt when something changes is, again, something to be handled outside the scope of cvsnt. One traditional approach is to use make for building, and use some automated tool for generating the dependencies which make uses.
See Chapter 15, How your build system interacts with CVS, for more information on doing builds in conjunction with cvsnt.
Your managers and project leaders are expected to talk to you frequently enough to make certain you are aware of schedules, merge points, branch names and release dates. If they don't, cvsnt can't help.
cvsnt is an instrument for making sources dance to your tune. But you are the piper and the composer. No instrument plays itself or writes its own music.
When faced with conflicts within a single file, most developers manage to resolve them without too much effort. But a more general definition of "conflict" includes problems too difficult to solve without communication between developers.
cvsnt cannot determine when simultaneous changes within a single file, or across a whole collection of files, will logically conflict with one another. Its concept of a conflict is purely textual, arising when two changes to the same base file are near enough to spook the merge (i.e. diff3) command.
cvsnt does not claim to help at all in figuring out non-textual or distributed conflicts in program logic.
For example: Say you change the arguments to function X defined in file A. At the same time, someone edits file B, adding new calls to function X using the old arguments. You are outside the realm of cvsnt's competence.
Acquire the habit of reading specs and talking to your peers.
Change control refers to a number of things. First of all it can mean bug-tracking, that is being able to keep a database of reported bugs and the status of each one (is it fixed? in what release? has the bug submitter agreed that it is fixed?). For interfacing cvsnt to an external bug-tracking system, see the rcsinfo and verifymsg files (Appendix B, Reference manual for Administrative files).
Another aspect of change control is keeping track of the fact that changes to several files were in fact changed together as one logical change. If you check in several files in a single cvs commit operation, cvsnt marks that commit with a session identifier or commitid.
cvsnt is also able to group a set of commits under a logical group by its group identifier, also known as the bugid. You can also selectively merge changes based on this identifier.
Another aspect of change control, in some systems, is the ability to keep track of the status of each change. Some changes have been written by a developer, others have been reviewed by a second developer, and so on. Generally, the way to do this with cvsnt is to generate a diff (using cvs diff or diff) and email it to someone who can then apply it using the patch utility. This is very flexible, but depends on mechanisms outside cvsnt to make sure nothing falls through the cracks.
It is possible to link into automated testing scripts using the postcommitand trigger functionality. This is outside the scope of this manual however.
Some systems provide ways to ensure that changes or releases go through various steps, with various approvals as needed. Generally, one can accomplish this with cvsnt but it might be a little more work. In some cases you'll want to use the commitinfo, loginfo, rcsinfo, or verifymsg files, to require that certain steps be performed before cvs will allow a checkin. Also consider whether features such as branches and tags can be used to perform tasks such as doing work in a development tree and then merging certain changes over to a stable tree only once they have been proven.