[cvsnt] Problems with ampersand modules

[Tony Hoyle]

Bo Berglund wrote:


> I would imagine that "ditching" the current use of modules is a bit
> hard. What would happen to those that use such a scheme?
> On the other hand I would *love* a better way to share code between
> modules than what is possible today.
> Could not the exeisting interpretation live on side by side with the
> new one?
> 
The problem is the existing code is splattered all over CVS and implemented
differently in different places.  It needs to be completely ripped out and
rewritten otherwise it'll just continue to be a source of bugs.  I'll do it
in the development branch anyway, but if it's what people want I'll do it
in the release, too.

Tony