[cvsnt] Re: wnt_fclose and FlushFileBuffers

Tony Hoyle tmh at nodomain.org
Thu Feb 6 22:19:08 GMT 2003


John Goehringer wrote:

> Yes, removing FlushFileBuffers does solve the performance problem.
> 
> I saw the most effect on large checkouts - you can 'hear' the difference
> in disk activity as the files are written to disk on the client. The
> server seems to do the same - I guess from flushing the last accessed time
> of the file.
> 
> I can get some comparison timings if you like.
> 
If it's going to make that much difference I'll push out another release on
Monday.  That'll give me enough time to make sure removing it doesn't cause
too many problems and pick up any feedback from this release over fixable
bugs.

Tony



More information about the cvsnt mailing list