[cvsnt] Re: Mergepoint question

[Tony Hoyle]

John Hall wrote:


> which seems a little messy, although I guess perfectly acceptable. I just
> wondered if there was a better way.
> 
That's how we do it, but then there are only one or two files in our tree
that this matters for (I've toyed with the idea of 'static' files that are
only ever updated if you force them.. it's not annoyed me enough to do
anything about it though).

Tony