[cvsnt] Re: NAV vs. CVSNT

[Keith D. Zimmerman]

That, coupled with the simple slow down of needing to run every file
action through that filter has been our experience as well.  The network
admins can spend all day crying about it, but real time scanning is not
a viable option, and is disabled.  :-)

keith d. zimmerman, mcsd 
eagle solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: torsten at tiscali.dk [mailto:torsten at tiscali.dk] 
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 6:07 AM
To: Lionello Lunesu; cvsnt at cvsnt.org
Subject: Re: [cvsnt] Re: NAV vs. CVSNT


That is also my experience.

-Torsten

>-- Original Message --
>From: "Lionello Lunesu" <lionello.lunesu at crystalinter.remove.com>
>Subject: Re: [cvsnt] Re: NAV vs. CVSNT
>Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:28:04 +0200
>To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org
>
>
>> I have set up the "file exclusions" on my server to exclude my
>repositories
>> and temp directory for CVS.  I don't know now if I am treading on 
>> thin
>ice
>> tempting the bug or if I've actually found a reasonable way around 
>> it.
>>
>> Does anyone know if this will work or not?  I have regular file 
>> shares
>on
>> the server as well as the CVS repositories and don't really want to 
>> depend on the clients to keep themselves clean.
>
>Don't count on it :-S
>I did the same thing and still got the errors (corrupted rcs files). I 
>think NAV still hooks on to every file access, and only checks the 
>exclusion inside the hook... Also, excluding .cpp/.h etc. didn't keep 
>files from being deleted occasionally when saving inside Visual 
>Studio.. (try
to
>press CTRL-S many times, if you get "could not save file"-errors 
>chances are that the file extually was deleted instead of saved :-S 
>)....

_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt at cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt