[cvsnt] Latest updates

[Glen Starrett]

Carl Zmola wrote:
> Like most CVS users, we don't do anything fancy. All we really want is 
> a stable version.  I don't want or need a new version every month.
> Is there an older version of CVS NT that is more stable?

Some time back Tony had set up 2.1.x as the latest dev branch and the 
2.0.x as stable, but there are new features popping up in 2.0 more often 
than 2.1 at this point AFAICT.

Tony--I have to agree here, it would be nice to get a version that is 
branched for stability updates only.  Maybe you should consider 
adjusting your current branching strategy?  The changes you have 
proposed for what is now 2.1 seem like they could easily be set off as a 
3.0 branch, and these things like renaming could go onto 2.1 until they 
are working 100%.

Of course, had you followed that previously, I think we'd be at about 
2.30.x for stable branch now... :)  I wouldn't want to slow down your 
efforts on the features you're adding but I see his point.

Regards,

-- 
Glen Starrett