[cvsnt] Re: Latest Updates

[Tony Hoyle]

keith d. zimmerman wrote:
> well, if i am not mistaken, it came from my question originally.  And if 
> this is supported, I no longer need the HEAD:date syntax:
>     cvs update -j DATE -j HEAD
> but that doesn't work either.  Thus the HEAD:date thing makes sense to me.

-D date -j HEAD might do something but it's more likely to use the 
default (checked out) branch, rather than HEAD (well *some* commands use 
the checked out branch for dates..., others don't.  Wonderfully consistent!)

The whole tag thing needs sorting out... log uses a different system 
again, checkout is slightly different as well.

A centralised/consistent tag syntax is definately something worth 
doing...  won't be for a little while though I think.

Tony