[cvsnt] Re: commit followed by a tag

[Glen Starrett]

Matt Schuckmann wrote:
> This whole discussion has brought us back to my origonal point, why can't
> you tag when you commit? Tony said it doesn't make sense, he also said that
> to use tags to discribe change sets is incorrect.

Why don't you just set up a postcommit script to tag the files that were 
just committed then?  I don't think it would be too difficult to implement.

Granted, I don't work that way in CVS, but it's flexible enough to work 
for just about everyone (that's the beauty).

Regards,

-- 
Glen Starrett