[cvsnt] Re: ACLs for groups?

[bwhicks at aep.com]

This email intrigued me, so I felt inclined to check it out.

If I have a group entry like so (in CVSROOT/group):

fakegroup: fred

and run a chacl command in module test like so:

cvs chacl -a none -u fakegroup -R

and then run:

cvs lsacl

I see:

user=fakegroup
        none

So it looks like it worked. But if I log in as fred, cvs behaves as though
I'm not in the acl at all. What gives? It does the same if I say
"noread,nowrite,notag,nocreate,nocontrol".

Brian

p.s. Still using 2.5.02.2099...



                                                                           
             "Oliver Giesen"                                               
             <ogware at gmx.net>                                              
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             cvsnt-bounces at cvs         cvsnt at cvsnt.org                     
             nt.org                                                     cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             10/14/2005 01:33          [cvsnt] Re: ACLs for groups?        
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Tony Hoyle wrote:

> Oliver Giesen wrote:
> > Following a short discussion on the CVSGUI list I played around a
> > little more with CVSNT's ACLs. Is it intentional that they don't
> > seem to apply to groups but only to individual users? Or would one
> > have to use a special syntax when applying ACLs for groups?
>
> Groups and users are treated identically (in a similar way to NT
> groups)

Erm, why only "similar"? I thought CVSNT was just "reusing" the NT
groups like it is "reusing" the NT users...


> so you can restrict to groups using the same syntax.

I suspect it was a test case error. I had not re-logged in after adding
myself to the group I was testing with. I just tried again with a
different group that I was already I member of and it worked just fine.

So, just forget I said anything. ;)

Cheers,

--
Oliver
----  ------------------
JID:  ogiesen at jabber.org
ICQ:  18777742     (http://wwp.icq.com/18777742)
_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt at cvsnt.org
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt