[cvsnt] cvs rename bugs

[Mark Levedahl]

David Somers wrote:
> Mark Levedahl wrote:
> 
>> Using 2.5.03, Build 2382, I've found two bugs in cvs rename that
>> required manual hacking of the repository for recovery:
> 
> Hardly surprising since rename is experimental/unstable.
> 
> Doing anything more complicated than an in-directory file rename is not
> recommended... using it for moves across directories is mad.
> 
Then perhaps March-Hare should not claim that cvsnt has rename, much 
less compare it to that of svn, etc?