[cvsnt] Re: Bad upgrade experience to current CVSNT 2.50.3 (2260)

John Peacock jpeacock at rowman.com
Fri Mar 24 18:20:08 GMT 2006


Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Also, it's not really a required DLL.  It's only ever used to produce 
> crashdumps.. it's good to have it around but not having it is hardly fatal.

I define required as "the program runs with this file present and 
doesn't work if the file is absent" which was the experience I had...

John



More information about the cvsnt mailing list