[cvsnt] Mergepoint issues on 22.214.171.124 b2382
tony.hoyle at march-hare.com
Mon Jan 15 13:02:53 GMT 2007
Tony Hoyle wrote:
> btw. evs now has an option to enable this behaviour (not on by default).
> Not decided how strong to make the warning though.. whether to say 'use
> this and you might lose stuff' or simply document that it only works
> correctly in certain usage scenarios.
Just read the other message. I chose -i to enable it (inverse
mergepoints, given that -b was used :p).
I agree a message every time it's used is not a good idea - that's
reserved for things you really want to stop people using.. and is
usually a precursor to the removal of an option - I wouldn't put it in
I'm prepared to be persuaded on the merits of -J if you've got a good
reason for it. My own thinking of making nearly identical options like
that is it doesn't work with the .cvsrc files.
More information about the cvsnt