[cvsnt] Re: sspi, ssh, and sserver

[Elliot Mednick]

>> 3) Why NOT use SSH?  Is sspi and sserver the preferred way?  Os is it
>> just that, historically, SSH was been harder to set up in Windows?
>> SSH is mentioned very little in the documentation.
>
>SSH on Windows has the BIG drawback that all checkins will happen as
>SYSTEM. As Tony has pointed out on this very thread there is currently
>no known workaround to this.

Right. But I if I don't mind that all users (all 4 of them) can have access
to all parts of the repository, this doesn't matter, right?  Or do I not
understand what's wrong with all checkins happening as SYSTEM.


>> These are two XP Home systems, no domains set up.  Just a Workgroup.  I
>> don't even know how to set up domains in XP Home.
>
>You can not join domains in XP Home, so don't worry that you don't know how
>:)
>That's one of the selling points of Pro; Home has been limited.

So, given that I only have a few users that need to get in, and I trust all
of them, and all I care about is that *only* these few users can get in, and
my server is based on XP Home, what *should* I use?  I'm still leaning
toward SSH.

Thanks!!