[cvsnt] --lf obsolete?

Flávio Etrusco flavio.etrusco at gmail.com
Mon Sep 4 04:44:28 BST 2006


> Yongwei Wu wrote:

May I intromit again? ;-)
First I'd like to assure I understand your problem correctly. It's
that 'update -lf' was sticky but 'update -k+L' isn't (as any 'update
-k' option), right?

1) Isn't 'checkout -k+L' supposed to maintain "stickiness"?
2) Is everyone else in your projects working differently than you?
3) I've just checked that svn doesn't seem to offer any kind of
feature like this ;-)
4) It's not part of the UNIX philosophy to provide options that allow
one to easily shoot oneself in the foot ;-)

Cheers,
Flávio


More information about the cvsnt mailing list